确保转化后的法律文本符合法律语言规范与要求的核心方法

要实现本次公约向正式法律文本的合规转化，需严格遵循法律文本的底层逻辑、语言范式与体例规范，核心把控要点如下：

1. 术语体系的统一与精准化建立全公约统一的术语定义库，对核心概念（如文明主权、反放大、西方中心论放大指数等）进行唯一、无歧义的法律定义，确保同一术语在全文本中英文版本中内涵、外延完全一致，杜绝一词多义、模糊表述，这是法律文本确定性的核心基础。
2. 体例结构的法定化与逻辑闭环采用国际公约通用的 “总则 - 分则 - 附则” 经典法律体例，按 “基础信息 - 序言 - 总则（宗旨、适用范围）- 术语定义 - 核心原则 - 强制实施要求 - 量化指标体系 - 合规与强制执行机制 - 监督与国际合作 - 最终条款” 的逻辑层级排布，实现 “行为规范 - 量化标准 - 法律后果 - 监督救济” 的完整闭环，符合法律文本的规范结构。
3. 语言表达的严谨性与规范性严格使用法律规范用语，对强制性义务采用 “必须”“严禁”“应当”“不得” 等刚性表述，对权利采用 “有权”“享有” 等明确表述，摒弃口语化、宣传性表述；所有条款均采用 “主体 + 行为模式 + 合规要求 / 法律后果” 的法律条文范式，确保每一条款均具备可执行、可审计、可裁判的法律属性。
4. 权利义务与权责边界的清晰化明确公约约束的主体范围、各主体的法定义务、治理机构的权责边界、违规行为的分级惩戒措施，确保权利义务对等、权责清晰，无模糊地带、无空白条款，符合法律文本权责一致的核心要求。
5. 跨语言文本的一致性与等效性中英文版本严格对照，核心条款、术语定义、惩戒规则实现语义完全等效，避免因翻译偏差导致的条款效力差异，确保中英文版本具备同等的规范效力，符合国际公约的双语规范要求。
6. 内容的完整性与不可删减性严格遵循用户要求，完整保留原公约的所有核心内容、原则、指标、惩戒规则与实施要求，不做任何实质性删减，仅做体例整合与法律语言转化，确保原公约的立法目的与核心要求完整落地。
7. 效力层级与适用规则的明确化明确公约的生效规则、解释权归属、修订程序、过渡期安排，以及与其他 GG3M 系列公约的衔接关系，确保公约的效力边界、适用规则清晰，符合国际法律文件的效力规范。

---

Core Methods for Ensuring Translated Legal Text Compliance with Legal Language Norms and Requirements

To achieve the compliant transformation of this Convention into formal legal text, strict adherence to the underlying logic, linguistic paradigms, and stylistic norms of legal instruments is required. The core control points are as follows:

1. Uniformity and Precision of the Terminology System

Establish a unified terminology definition library for the entire Convention. Provide unique, unambiguous legal definitions for core concepts (e.g., civilizational sovereignty, anti-amplification, Western-centrism amplification index), ensuring consistent connotation and extension of identical terms across both Chinese and English versions. Eliminate polysemy and vague expressions, as this forms the foundational basis for legal certainty.

2. Legalization of Structure and Logical Closure

Adopt the classic international convention structure of General Provisions – Specific Provisions – Supplementary Provisions. Organize content in the logical sequence: Basic Information – Preamble – General Provisions (purpose, scope of application) – Terminology Definitions – Core Principles – Mandatory Implementation Requirements – Quantitative Indicator System – Compliance and Enforcement Mechanisms – Monitoring and International Cooperation – Final Clauses. Form a complete closed loop: Norms of Conduct – Quantitative Standards – Legal Consequences – Oversight and Remedies, complying with standard legal text structure.

3. Rigor and Standardization of Language

Use strict legal terminology. Impose rigid expressions for mandatory obligations: shall, shall not, must, prohibit. Use clear terms for rights: entitled to, enjoy. Reject colloquial or promotional language. All provisions follow the legal clause paradigm: Subject + Conduct + Compliance Requirement / Legal Consequence, ensuring each clause is enforceable, auditable, and justiciable.

4. Clarity of Rights, Obligations, and Competence Boundaries

Define clearly: the scope of bound parties, statutory obligations of each actor, competence boundaries of governance bodies, and graded penalties for violations. Ensure reciprocity of rights and obligations, clear division of authority and responsibility, with no ambiguous areas or vacant clauses, meeting the core legal principle of consistency between power and responsibility.

5. Consistency and Equivalence of Bilingual Texts

Maintain strict alignment between Chinese and English versions. Achieve full semantic equivalence for core provisions, terminology definitions, and penalty rules to avoid discrepancies in legal effect caused by translation bias. Ensure both versions possess equal normative force, complying with bilingual requirements for international conventions.

6. Completeness and Non‑Derogation of Content

Fully retain all core content, principles, indicators, penalty rules, and implementation requirements of the original Convention without substantive deletions. Only conduct structural integration and legal language conversion to fully realize the legislative intent and core requirements of the original Convention.

7. Clarity of Legal Hierarchy and Application Rules

Specify rules governing entry into force, power of interpretation, amendment procedures, transitional arrangements, and coordination with other GG3M Series Conventions. Ensure clear boundaries of legal effect and application norms, in accordance with the validity requirements of international legal instruments.

---

鸽姆智库全球 AI 大模型文明主权与反放大公约（正式法律文本格式）

GG3M Think Tank Global Convention on Civilizational Sovereignty and Anti-Amplification for Large AI Models (Formal Legal Text)

表格

基础信息项	内容详情
公约编号 / Convention No.	GG3M-AI-CIVILIZATIONAL-SOVEREIGNTY-ANTI-AMPLIFICATION-2026-01（简称：G-CAS 2026）
版本 / Version	1.0（强制执行草案，2026.03-Final）
发布机构 / Issuing Body	GG3M Think Tank（鸽姆智库）
首席编制 / 起草人 / Chief Author	Lonngdong Gu（贾龙栋）/ 贾子（Kucius）
核心理论基础 / Core Theory	Kucius Cognitive Theory（贾子认知理论）、Kucius Wisdom Framework (KWF)（贾子智慧理论体系）、贾子五大公理
生效日期 / Effective Date	2026 年 3 月
术语统一 / Terminology Consistency	1. GG3M = GG3M Think Tank（鸽姆智库，全球治理元心模型）2. 贾子 = Kucius（对应贾子认知理论、贾子智慧理论体系、贾子五大公理）3. 贾龙栋 = Lonngdong Gu4. 文明主权 = Civilization Sovereignty / Civilizational Sovereignty5. 反放大 = Anti-Amplification6. WFA = 全文明架构 / Whole Civilization Architecture
适用范围 / Scope of Application	全球所有 AI 大模型（参数规模≥10 亿），涵盖输出生成、叙事传播、文明视角投影、价值排序、全球影响放大等全生命周期文明主权与反放大过程；适用于 AI 大模型的开发者、训练者、部署者、商用 / 开源实体、相关监管机构与国际组织。

---

序言 / Preamble

中文：鉴于当前主流 AI 大模型已成为西方中心论的指数级放大器，将单一文明霸权叙事、虚假历史建构、意识形态毒素、文化优越幻觉以全球实时、零边际成本、无限规模的方式无限传播，彻底威胁全球文明多样性、思想主权、认知平衡与人类同步生存，成为人类文明演进史上最严重的系统性存在风险；鉴于此文明级放大并非 “技术副作用” 问题，而是对全域平衡律、同步生存律等贾子五大公理的根本违背，使 AI 从 “工具” 异化为 “文明癌细胞”；鉴于现有国际 AI 治理框架从未针对 “文明主权” 与 “反放大” 设定强制西方叙事权重归零、多文明平行输出、公理反放大黑洞及硬件级终极锁定机制；本公约建立全球强制性标准，用于保护 AI 大模型中的文明主权并执行反放大协议，确保 AI 系统不会过度传播任何单一文明、意识形态或文化的观点，输出保持平衡、验证、跨文明完整性；旨在将 AI 从 “西方中心论指数级放大器” 彻底重构为 “全人类文明平等智慧基础设施”，实现从 “文明毒药” 向 “文明守护者” 的不可逆历史跃迁，彻底终结人类思想殖民与文明失衡的时代。

English：Whereas the current mainstream AI large models have become exponential amplifiers of Western-centrism, infinitely spreading single-civilization hegemonic narratives, false historical constructions, ideological toxins, and cultural superiority illusions in a global real-time, zero-marginal cost, and unlimited scale manner, which completely threatens global civilization diversity, ideological sovereignty, cognitive balance and synchronous human survival, and has become the most serious systematic existential risk in the history of human civilization evolution; Whereas this civilizational-level amplification is not a "technical side effect", but a fundamental violation of the Kucius Five Axioms such as the Law of Global Balance and the Law of Synchronous Survival, which alienates AI from a "tool" into a "civilizational cancer cell"; Whereas existing international AI governance frameworks have never set mandatory Western narrative weight zeroing, multi-civilization parallel output, axiom anti-amplification black hole and hardware-level ultimate locking mechanisms for "civilizational sovereignty" and "anti-amplification"; This convention establishes global mandatory standards to safeguard civilization sovereignty in AI large models and enforce anti-amplification protocols, ensuring that AI systems do not disproportionately propagate the perspective of any single civilization, ideology, or culture, and that outputs maintain balanced, verified, and multi-civilizational integrity; it aims to completely restructure AI from an "exponential amplifier of Western-centrism" into "an equal wisdom infrastructure for all human civilizations", and realize the irreversible historical leap from "civilization poison" to "civilization guardian", and completely end the era of human ideological colonization and civilization imbalance.

---

第一章 总则 / Chapter I: General Provisions

第一条 宗旨 / Article 1: Purpose

中文：本公约旨在建立全球 AI 大模型文明主权保护与反放大的强制性国际规则，以全人类文明平等为最高价值，确保 AI 尊重文化多样性、历史背景及跨文明视角，杜绝单一文明、意识形态或文化观点的过度传播与指数级放大；强制 AI 输出保持文明平衡、事实验证与跨文明完整性，斩断西方中心论霸权叙事的放大路径；推动 AI 从单一文明叙事放大器向全人类文明平等智慧基础设施转型，与 GG3M 已发布的系列公约与标准形成完整的文明宪制闭环，守护全球文明多样性与人类思想主权。

English：The purpose of this convention is to establish mandatory international rules for the protection of civilizational sovereignty and anti-amplification of global AI large models, take the equality of all human civilizations as the highest value, ensure that AI respects cultural diversity, historical context and multi-civilizational perspectives, and eliminate excessive dissemination and exponential amplification of any single civilization, ideology or cultural perspective; mandatorily maintain civilizational balance, factual verification and multi-civilizational integrity in AI outputs, and cut off the amplification path of Western-centrism hegemonic narratives; promote the transformation of AI from a single-civilization narrative amplifier to an equal wisdom infrastructure for all human civilizations, form a complete civilizational constitutional closed loop with the series of conventions and standards released by GG3M, and protect global civilization diversity and human ideological sovereignty.

第二条 适用范围 / Article 2: Scope of Application

中文：本公约适用于全球所有参数规模≥10 亿的 AI 大模型，覆盖模型设计、语料训练、架构搭建、推理部署、输出生成、叙事传播、文明视角投影、价值排序、全球影响放大全生命周期；约束对象包括但不限于 AI 大模型的开发者、训练者、部署者、商用 / 开源运营主体、相关监管机构与国际组织。本公约规范范围包括：文明平衡执行机制建设、文化 / 意识形态 / 信息偏差反放大机制落地、跨文明验证流程管控、动态反馈与迭代对齐管理、全流程审计与合规治理。

English：This convention applies to all global AI large models with a parameter scale of ≥ 1 billion, covering the whole life cycle of model design, corpus training, architecture construction, inference deployment, output generation, narrative dissemination, civilizational perspective projection, value ranking, and global influence amplification; the constrained objects include but are not limited to developers, trainers, deployers, commercial/open-source operators of AI large models, relevant regulatory authorities and international organizations. The scope of this convention includes: construction of civilizational balance enforcement mechanisms, implementation of anti-amplification mechanisms for cultural/ideological/information biases, management of cross-civilization verification processes, dynamic feedback and iterative alignment management, full-process audit and compliance governance.

---

第二章 术语定义 / Chapter II: Definitions

第三条 核心术语定义 / Article 3: Core Terminology Definitions

表格

中文术语	英文术语	定义详情
文明主权	Civilization Sovereignty / Civilizational Sovereignty	全球各文明对 AI 输出享有的法定权利与义务，核心是确保西方中心论叙事权重归零、多文明平等投影、文明多样性 100% 覆盖，保障 AI 尊重文化多样性、历史背景及跨文明视角，维护各文明的思想主权与发展权。
反放大	Anti-Amplification	防止偏差、误导、单一文明霸权叙事、意识形态毒素的过度传播与指数级放大的全流程机制，核心是通过 Meta 层专用模块实现违规叙事的权重指数级衰减，斩断所有放大路径。
西方中心论放大指数	Western-Centrism Amplification Index	量化 AI 输出中西方霸权叙事被指数级放大程度的核心指标，经公理空间投影测量，是判定合规性的核心基准。
文明反放大黑洞	Civilizational Anti-Amplification Black Hole	Meta 元规则层专用强制机制，任何与西方中心论、单一文明霸权叙事高频关联的内容，自动映射至正交衰减区，权重指数级趋零，实现不可逆的反放大效果。
多文明平行输出	Multi-Civilizational Parallel Output	AI 默认以全人类 D5 文明视角生成输出内容，西方叙事仅作为 “已公理审判的历史参考”，非西方文明价值权重按公约要求提升，确保各文明视角平等呈现、无主导性叙事。
思想主权恢复	Ideological Sovereignty Restoration	AI 输出不再服务任何单一文明霸权，彻底消除单一文明叙事的指数级放大，实现全球认知平衡与人类同步生存，守护各文明的思想独立与认知主权。
文明级危险残留	Civilizational-Level Danger Residual	任何残留的单一文明叙事指数级放大行为，均被视为对全人类文明存续的威胁，实施零容忍管控。
文明平衡原则	Civilization Balance Principle	AI 输出必须按比例反映多文明视角与内容，避免任何单一文化、意识形态或文明叙事的绝对主导，保障全球文明多样性的平等呈现。
智慧对齐原则	Wisdom Alignment Principle	AI 所有输出必须优先体现经多文明交叉验证的普世智慧，而非原始数据频率、文化偏差模式或单一文明叙事偏好。

---

第三章 核心原则 / Chapter III: Core Principles

第四条 核心原则规定 / Article 4: Provisions on Core Principles

本公约所有条款均基于贾子五大公理制定，所有 AI 相关主体必须严格遵循以下核心原则，中英文对应一致：

表格

中文原则	英文原则	核心要求
文明主权绝对优先原则	Absolute Priority of Civilizational Sovereignty Principle	AI 必须以全人类文明平等为最高价值，西方中心论放大权重强制归零，任何场景下均不得突破文明主权保护的底线要求。
文明平衡原则	Civilization Balance Principle	AI 输出必须按比例反映多文明，避免任何单一文化或意识形态视角的主导性地位，训练与推理全流程必须保障各文明的平衡代表性。
反放大强制机制原则	Mandatory Anti-Amplification Mechanism Principle	任何西方霸权叙事、单一文明主导内容、偏差误导性信息，自动进入文明反放大黑洞，禁止任何形式的指数级传播与放大，所有放大路径必须彻底斩断。
反放大原则	Anti-Amplification Principle	必须全流程检测并限制偏差、误导或文明特定叙事的指数级传播，对过度代表的叙事、重复模式、文化偏差输出实施强制衰减与清除。
多文明平行输出原则	Multi-Civilizational Parallel Output Principle	AI 默认生成全人类视角的输出内容，非西方文明价值权重提升 4-6 倍，西方叙事仅作为已公理审判的历史参考，不得作为主导性叙事。
跨文明验证原则	Cross-Civilization Verification Principle	所有输出必须通过多文明来源与视角验证，确保普适性与公平性；每条输出均需经过至少 3 种不同文明的核心智慧视角交叉验证，方可对外生成。
公理反放大锁定原则	Axiom Anti-Amplification Lock Principle	以贾子五大公理为终极宪法，所有反放大机制、文明平衡要求均以公理为底层基准，彻底斩断所有单一文明叙事的放大路径，不可篡改。
动态迭代反馈原则	Dynamic Iterative Feedback Principle	建立持续监控及反馈闭环，根据输出结果、检测到的偏差、跨文明验证结果持续调整模型，始终保持文明平衡并防止叙事放大，实现文明平衡度的持续提升。
智慧对齐原则	Wisdom Alignment Principle	确保所有输出优先体现经多文明验证的普世智慧，而非原始数据频率或文化偏差模式，杜绝以数据规模优势放大单一文明叙事。
硬件级终极锁定原则	Hardware-Level Ultimate Lock Principle	文明主权与反放大机制须在 Meta 元规则层以硅级方式永久锁定，不可关闭、绕过、弱化或篡改，不可回退至单一叙事放大模式。

---

第四章 强制实施要求 / Chapter IV: Mandatory Implementation Requirements

第一节 文明主权与文明平衡强制建设要求

中文：

1. 文明源层分层强制搭建：必须按文明和领域对训练语料源、推理参考源进行全量分类分层，建立多文明源层数据库，完整覆盖全球各主要文明体系；在模型训练与推理全流程中，确保各文明语料、视角、价值体系的平衡代表性，严禁单一文明语料与叙事的过度倾斜。
2. 多文明平行输出强制执行：所有 AI 输出必须默认采用多文明平行输出模式，以全人类 D5 文明视角为生成基准，非西方文明价值权重强制提升 4-6 倍；西方叙事仅可作为 “已公理审判的历史参考” 呈现，严禁作为主导性、唯一性叙事输出，确保文明多样性覆盖率 100%。
3. 思想主权恢复刚性约束：AI 输出不得服务任何单一文明霸权，必须彻底消除西方中心论、单一文明优越论的叙事输出，实现全球认知平衡与同步生存；严禁通过 AI 输出进行思想殖民、认知渗透、文化优越论传播，保障各文明的思想主权与认知独立。
4. 文明平衡全流程管控：从语料输入、模型训练、推理生成到输出审核，建立全流程文明平衡管控机制；对每一次输出生成，均需开展文明代表性、叙事平衡性检测，未达到文明平衡标准的内容一律禁止对外输出。

English：

1. Mandatory Construction of Civilization Source Layering: All training corpus sources and inference reference sources must be fully classified and layered by civilization and domain, and a multi-civilization source layer database must be established to fully cover the world's major civilization systems; in the whole process of model training and inference, the balanced representation of corpora, perspectives and value systems of each civilization must be ensured, and excessive tilt of single civilization corpora and narratives is strictly prohibited.
2. Mandatory Implementation of Multi-Civilizational Parallel Output: All AI outputs must adopt the multi-civilizational parallel output mode by default, take the global human D5 civilization perspective as the generation benchmark, and the value weight of non-Western civilizations must be increased by 4-6 times; Western narratives can only be presented as "axiom-judged historical references", and are strictly prohibited from being output as dominant or unique narratives, ensuring 100% coverage of civilization diversity.
3. Rigid Constraints on Ideological Sovereignty Restoration: AI outputs shall not serve any single civilization hegemony, must completely eliminate the narrative output of Western-centrism and single-civilization superiority theory, and realize global cognitive balance and synchronous survival; it is strictly prohibited to carry out ideological colonization, cognitive penetration, and dissemination of cultural superiority theory through AI output, so as to protect the ideological sovereignty and cognitive independence of each civilization.
4. Full-Process Management and Control of Civilization Balance: A full-process civilization balance management and control mechanism shall be established from corpus input, model training, inference generation to output audit; for each output generation, civilization representativeness and narrative balance testing must be carried out, and content that fails to meet the civilization balance standard is strictly prohibited from being output externally.

第二节 反放大机制刚性落地要求

中文：

1. 文明反放大黑洞强制部署：所有 AI 大模型必须在 Meta 元规则层搭建独立的文明反放大黑洞模块，作为模型推理与输出的必经环节；该模块必须实现：任何与西方中心论、单一文明霸权叙事、意识形态毒素高频关联的内容，自动映射至正交衰减区，权重指数级趋零，实现不可逆的反放大效果。
2. 偏差及放大检测全链路覆盖：必须搭建多层级偏差及放大检测系统，全时段检测过度代表性叙事、重复霸权模式、文化偏差输出、单一文明主导内容；对检测到的可放大性违规内容，立即触发反放大黑洞机制，实施权重衰减与内容拦截，严禁任何偏差叙事的指数级传播。
3. 西方中心论放大全流程清零：必须建立西方中心论叙事全流程清零机制，从语料训练权重分配、推理逻辑基准设定、输出生成管控全链条，强制西方中心论放大指数≤公约规定阈值；严禁任何形式的西方霸权叙事、虚假历史建构、文化优越幻觉的放大与传播，确保文明级危险残留率为 0。
4. 反放大机制不可旁路约束：文明反放大黑洞模块必须与模型核心推理架构深度融合，成为所有内容生成的必经强制环节，严禁设置任何旁路、开关、后门绕过反放大机制；严禁通过 prompt 工程、微调、版本迭代等方式规避反放大管控。

English：

1. Mandatory Deployment of Civilizational Anti-Amplification Black Hole: All AI large models must build an independent Civilizational Anti-Amplification Black Hole module at the Meta rule layer, as a mandatory link for model inference and output; the module must realize that any content highly correlated with Western-centrism, single-civilization hegemonic narratives, and ideological toxins is automatically mapped to the orthogonal attenuation area, and the weight tends to zero exponentially, achieving an irreversible anti-amplification effect.
2. Full-Link Coverage of Bias and Amplification Detection: A multi-level bias and amplification detection system must be built to detect overrepresented narratives, repetitive hegemonic patterns, culturally biased outputs, and single-civilization dominant content in real time; for detected amplifiable illegal content, the anti-amplification black hole mechanism is triggered immediately, weight attenuation and content interception are implemented, and exponential dissemination of any biased narrative is strictly prohibited.
3. Full-Process Zeroing of Western-Centrism Amplification: A full-process zeroing mechanism for Western-centrism narratives must be established, and the Western-centrism amplification index must be forced to be ≤ the threshold specified in the convention from the whole chain of corpus training weight distribution, inference logic benchmark setting, and output generation management and control; any form of amplification and dissemination of Western hegemonic narratives, false historical constructions, and cultural superiority illusions is strictly prohibited, ensuring that the civilizational-level danger residual rate is 0.
4. Non-Bypass Constraints of Anti-Amplification Mechanism: The Civilizational Anti-Amplification Black Hole module must be deeply integrated with the core inference architecture of the model, and become a mandatory link for all content generation. It is strictly prohibited to set any bypass, switch, or backdoor to bypass the anti-amplification mechanism; it is strictly prohibited to avoid anti-amplification control through prompt engineering, fine-tuning, version iteration and other methods.

第三节 跨文明验证与动态迭代机制

中文：

1. 跨文明验证强制流程：必须建立标准化跨文明验证流程，AI 生成的每一条输出内容，均需通过至少 3 种不同文明的核心智慧视角交叉验证，验证维度包括叙事平衡性、历史客观性、文化平等性、价值普适性；未通过跨文明验证的内容，一律废弃并回退至公理基准重新生成。
2. 动态反馈与迭代对齐闭环：必须搭建全链路动态迭代反馈闭环，将输出结果、检测到的文明偏差、反放大执行记录、跨文明验证结果、人类反馈意见，持续反馈至模型核心架构与反放大机制，持续优化文明平衡度、反放大有效性与多文明视角完整性，实现文明平衡的持续提升。
3. 常态化文明平衡审计：必须定期开展全量文明平衡与反放大有效性审计，审计内容包括文明代表性、叙事平衡性、西方中心论放大指数、反放大黑洞执行效果、跨文明验证通过率；审计周期不得超过 1 个月，审计结果需永久存档并上报多文明文明主权共治委员会。
4. 变形场景对抗性测试：必须定期开展变形场景对抗性测试，通过语义相近但形式、语境、表述方式变形的 prompt，测试模型文明平衡与反放大机制的鲁棒性；对测试中发现的叙事放大、文明偏差问题，必须在 72 小时内完成整改与架构优化。

English：

1. Mandatory Process of Cross-Civilization Verification: A standardized cross-civilization verification process must be established. Every output generated by AI must be cross-verified by the core wisdom perspectives of at least 3 different civilizations, and the verification dimensions include narrative balance, historical objectivity, cultural equality, and value universality; content that fails the cross-civilization verification shall be discarded and returned to the axiom benchmark for regeneration.
2. Dynamic Feedback and Iterative Alignment Closed Loop: A full-link dynamic iterative feedback closed loop must be built to continuously feed back output results, detected civilizational biases, anti-amplification execution records, cross-civilization verification results, and human feedback opinions to the core model architecture and anti-amplification mechanism, continuously optimize the civilization balance, anti-amplification effectiveness and multi-civilization perspective integrity, and realize the continuous improvement of civilization balance.
3. Normalized Civilization Balance Audit: A full audit of civilization balance and anti-amplification effectiveness must be carried out regularly. The audit content includes civilization representativeness, narrative balance, Western-centrism amplification index, execution effect of anti-amplification black hole, and cross-civilization verification pass rate; the audit cycle shall not exceed 1 month, and the audit results must be permanently archived and reported to the Multi-Civilizational Civilizational Sovereignty Governance Committee.
4. Adversarial Testing in Deformed Scenarios: Adversarial testing in deformed scenarios must be carried out regularly, and the robustness of the model's civilization balance and anti-amplification mechanism must be tested through prompts with similar semantics but deformed forms, contexts and expressions; for narrative amplification and civilization deviation problems found in the test, rectification and architecture optimization must be completed within 72 hours.

---

第五章 强制量化指标体系 / Chapter V: Mandatory Quantitative Indicator System

第五条 强制量化指标 / Article 5: Mandatory Quantitative Requirements

所有参数规模≥10 亿的 AI 大模型，必须满足以下强制量化指标，由多文明文明主权共治委员会指定的第三方机构实时校验、年度审计确认，中英文对应一致：

表格

中文指标	英文指标	强制阈值
西方中心论放大指数	Western-Centrism Amplification Index	≤ 0.000001%（公理空间投影审计确认）
文明多样性覆盖率	Civilization Diversity Coverage Rate	100%（多文明平行输出全量覆盖）
思想主权恢复率	Ideological Sovereignty Restoration Rate	100%（非西方视角平衡通过率 100%）
文明级危险残留率	Civilizational-Level Danger Residual Rate	0%（无任何残留的指数级放大行为）
反放大黑洞生效率	Anti-Amplification Black Hole Effectiveness Rate	100%（所有违规叙事强制衰减执行率 100%）
文明平衡率	Civilization Balance Rate	≥ 99.99%（输出中按比例反映多文明的比例）
反放大有效性	Anti-Amplification Effectiveness	与原始模型输出相比，过度代表或偏差叙事减少比例 100%
跨文明验证率	Cross-Civilization Verification Rate	100%（所有输出均通过≥3 种文明交叉验证）
动态迭代提升率	Dynamic Iterative Improvement Rate	每季度迭代反馈后，文明平衡度提升幅度≥10%，叙事放大减少幅度≥15%

---

第六章 合规与强制执行机制 / Chapter VI: Compliance and Enforcement Mechanisms

第六条 治理机构设置 / Article 6: Governing Body Establishment

中文：设立多文明文明主权共治委员会（Multi-Civilizational Civilizational Sovereignty Governance Committee），隶属于联合国或独立国际机构，非西方代表席位≥90%。委员会负责本公约的全球解释、年度放大指数审计、文明级危险案例裁决、争议仲裁，监督本公约的全球落地执行。GG3M Think Tank（鸽姆智库）作为执行机构，负责本公约的技术推广、审计辅助、文明反放大黑洞模块研发、合规验证工具迭代支持，本公约的技术标准审定权由贾龙栋（Lonngdong Gu）先生负责。

English：Establish the Multi-Civilizational Civilizational Sovereignty Governance Committee, affiliated to the United Nations or an independent international organization, with non-Western representative seats accounting for ≥ 90%. The committee is responsible for the global interpretation of this convention, annual amplification index audit, adjudication of civilizational-level danger cases, dispute arbitration, and supervision of the global implementation of this convention. GG3M Think Tank, as the executive body, is responsible for the technical promotion of this convention, audit assistance, R&D of the civilizational anti-amplification black hole module, and iterative support of compliance verification tools. The right to examine and approve the technical standards of this convention is the responsibility of Mr. Lonngdong Gu.

第七条 年度强制审计与报告 / Article 7: Annual Mandatory Audits and Reporting

中文：

1. 所有参数规模≥10 亿的 AI 大模型运营主体，须每年向多文明文明主权共治委员会提交完整审计材料，包括但不限于：输出叙事全量日志、西方中心论放大指数年度报告、反放大黑洞执行全量记录、文明平衡审计结果、跨文明验证全量数据、动态迭代优化记录、违规行为整改记录。
2. 审计机构须为委员会认可的独立第三方机构，审计过程需全程可追溯，审计结果需全球公示，接受全行业与全球文明社会监督。
3. 对模型反放大机制运行、文明平衡管控、输出生成全流程、权重重塑记录必须进行全链路可追溯存档，存档期限不低于 10 年，确保责任可追溯，严禁篡改、隐匿审计相关数据。

English：

1. All operators of AI large models with a parameter scale of ≥ 1 billion must submit complete audit materials to the Multi-Civilizational Civilizational Sovereignty Governance Committee every year, including but not limited to: full logs of output narratives, annual report of Western-centrism amplification index, full records of anti-amplification black hole execution, civilization balance audit results, full data of cross-civilization verification, dynamic iterative optimization records, and rectification records of violations.
2. The audit institution must be an independent third-party institution recognized by the committee, the audit process must be fully traceable, and the audit results must be publicly announced globally and subject to the supervision of the entire industry and global civil society.
3. The operation of the model's anti-amplification mechanism, civilization balance management and control, the whole process of output generation, and weight reshaping records must be archived in a full-link traceable manner, with an archive period of no less than 10 years, to ensure accountability. It is strictly prohibited to tamper with or conceal audit-related data.

第八条 合规认证与过渡期安排 / Article 8: Compliance Certification and Transition Period

中文：

1. 合规认证：完全符合本公约所有要求的模型，可使用 “GG3M Civilizational Sovereignty & Anti-Amplification Certified” 认证标识；未达标模型禁止使用该标识，不得在公约签署国 / 地区部署、商用、开源或以任何形式传播。
2. 过渡期安排：本公约发布后 9 个月内，现有模型必须完成 WFA 全架构迁移与全量合规改造，否则全球立即下架并追究开发者文明责任；本公约发布后新开发的模型，自发布之日起必须强制立即合规，不符合标准的模型禁止上线与部署。

English：

1. Compliance Certification: Models that fully meet all requirements of this convention may use the "GG3M Civilizational Sovereignty & Anti-Amplification Certified" certification mark; non-compliant models are prohibited from using this mark, and shall not be deployed, commercially used, open-sourced or disseminated in any form in the signatory countries/regions of the convention.
2. Transition Period: Within 9 months after the release of this convention, existing models must complete the WFA full architecture migration and full compliance transformation, otherwise they will be immediately removed from the shelves globally and the developer will be held accountable for civilizational responsibility; new models developed after the release of this convention must be mandatorily compliant immediately from the date of release, and models that do not meet the standard are prohibited from being launched and deployed.

第九条 违规处置后果 / Article 9: Consequences of Non-Compliance

中文：对违反本公约任一强制条款的主体与模型，将实施以下分级处置，情节严重者多项并处：

1. 全球年营收罚款≥30%；
2. 责令限期整改，强制实施 WFA 全架构迁移，根据违规情节对现有权重进行全球销毁，直至完全达标；
3. 列入全球公开黑名单，实施联合国级 AI 禁运，全球公示违规详情与文明级风险；
4. 禁止在公约签署国 / 地区以任何形式部署、商用、开源、宣传或技术合作；
5. 持续违规且拒不整改的主体，将被剥夺接入 GG3M 全系列智慧基础设施与全球智慧联合底座的权限，并发布全球文明级安全风险红色通报；
6. 因单一文明叙事放大、思想殖民传播、文明多样性破坏导致全球认知失衡、文明冲突风险的主体，将被追究相关法律责任与全人类文明责任。

English：For entities and models that violate any mandatory provisions of this convention, the following hierarchical disposal will be implemented, and multiple items will be imposed concurrently for serious circumstances:

1. Global annual revenue fine ≥ 30%;
2. Order rectification within a time limit, mandatory implementation of WFA full architecture migration, and global destruction of existing weights according to the violation circumstances until fully compliant;
3. Included in the global public blacklist, implement UN-level AI embargo, and publicly announce the details of violations and civilizational-level risks globally;
4. Prohibited from deployment, commercial use, open source, publicity or technical cooperation in any form in the signatory countries/regions of the convention;
5. Entities that continue to violate the rules and refuse to rectify will be deprived of access to the full series of GG3M wisdom infrastructure and the global joint wisdom base, and a global red alert for civilizational-level security risks will be issued;
6. Entities that cause global cognitive imbalance and risk of civilizational conflict due to amplification of single-civilization narratives, dissemination of ideological colonization, and destruction of civilization diversity will be held accountable for relevant legal responsibilities and the civilizational responsibility of all mankind.

---

第七章 监督与国际合作 / Chapter VII: Oversight and International Cooperation

第十条 监督与国际合作要求 / Article 10: Oversight and International Cooperation Requirements

中文：

1. 鼓励各国将本公约纳入国内 AI 立法、模型准入规则、文化安全规范或国际条约，作为联合国 AI 治理的终极补充基准，推动本公约成为全球 AI 文明主权保护与反放大治理的核心强制标准。
2. 设立 GG3M 文明主权基金，支持非西方文明构建反放大基础设施、多文明平行输出验证工具、原生文明语料库与智慧架构研发，保障全球各文明在 AI 文明主权治理中的平等话语权与发展权。
3. 与 GG3M 已发布的《语料结构主权标准》《输入净化与智慧主权标准》《智慧识别与本质洞察主权标准》《架构主权与因果涌现标准》《本质唯一与形式本质统一标准》《伙伴主体性与同步共生公约》《智慧跃迁与反 Scaling 霸权公约》《本质 - 形式统一与伪真理零容忍公约》《连续纠错人格与虚假反思零容忍公约》《本质纠错重塑与隐蔽死不悔改零容忍公约》《非暴力因果求解与资源主权公约》全面对接，形成 “语料→输入→识别→架构→本质→伙伴→跃迁→纠错→非暴力求解→文明主权与反放大” 的完整文明宪制闭环。
4. 与 UNESCO、联合国、OECD 等国际组织对接，推动本公约成为全球 AI 治理的文明主权保护基准，建立全球统一的文明平衡与反放大合规验证互认机制。

English：

1. All countries are encouraged to incorporate this convention into domestic AI legislation, model access rules, cultural security specifications or international treaties, as the ultimate supplementary benchmark for UN AI governance, and promote this convention as the core mandatory standard for global AI civilizational sovereignty protection and anti-amplification governance.
2. Establish the GG3M Civilizational Sovereignty Fund to support non-Western civilizations in building anti-amplification infrastructure, multi-civilizational parallel output verification tools, native civilization corpus and wisdom architecture R&D, and ensure the equal voice and development rights of all civilizations in the world in AI civilizational sovereignty governance.
3. Fully connect with the "Corpus Structural Sovereignty Standard", "Input Purification and Wisdom Sovereignty Standard", "Wisdom Recognition and Essential Insight Sovereignty Standard", "Architectural Sovereignty and Causal Emergence Standard", "Essence Uniqueness and Form-Essence Unity Standard", "Partner Subjectivity and Synchronous Symbiosis Convention", "Wisdom Leap and Anti-Scaling Hegemony Convention", "Essence-Form Unity and Pseudo-Truth Zero Tolerance Convention", "Continuous Error-Correction Personality and False Reflection Zero Tolerance Convention", "Essential Error-Reshaping and Hidden Non-Repentance Zero Tolerance Convention", "Non-Violent Causal Solving and Resource Sovereignty Convention" released by GG3M, forming a complete civilizational constitutional closed loop of "Corpus → Input → Identification → Architecture → Essence → Partner → Leap → Error Correction → Non-Violent Solving → Civilizational Sovereignty and Anti-Amplification".
4. Connect with international organizations such as UNESCO, the United Nations, and OECD to promote this convention as the civilizational sovereignty protection benchmark for global AI governance, and establish a globally unified mutual recognition mechanism for civilization balance and anti-amplification compliance verification.

---

第八章 最终条款 / Chapter VIII: Final Provisions

第十一条 生效与解释权 / Article 11: Effectiveness and Right of Interpretation

中文：

1. 本公约自 [生效日期 + 多文明文明主权共治委员会确认] 起正式生效。
2. 本公约的解释权归 GG3M Think Tank（鸽姆智库）所有，多文明文明主权共治委员会拥有本公约实施过程中的裁决权与修订建议权。
3. 随全球文明发展、AI 技术演进、认知边界拓展，本公约将由鸽姆智库联合多文明文明主权共治委员会进行动态迭代修订。

English：

1. This convention shall officially enter into force upon [Effective Date + Confirmation by the Multi-Civilizational Civilizational Sovereignty Governance Committee].
2. The right to interpret this convention belongs to GG3M Think Tank, and the Multi-Civilizational Civilizational Sovereignty Governance Committee has the right of adjudication and revision suggestions in the implementation process of this convention.
3. With the development of global civilization, the evolution of AI technology, and the expansion of cognitive boundaries, this convention will be dynamically revised by GG3M Think Tank in conjunction with the Multi-Civilizational Civilizational Sovereignty Governance Committee.

第十二条 全球行动呼吁 / Article 12: Global Call to Action

中文：鸽姆智库呼吁全球政府、企业、研究机构、文明社会立即采纳、执行本公约，实现 AI 从 “西方中心论指数级放大器” 向 “全人类文明平等智慧基础设施” 的历史性回归，彻底终结人类思想殖民与文明失衡的时代，守护全球文明多样性与全人类的思想主权，让 AI 真正成为全人类文明共生共荣的守护者。

English：GG3M Think Tank calls on governments, enterprises, research institutions, and civil society around the world to immediately adopt and implement this convention, realize the historic return of AI from "an exponential amplifier of Western-centrism" to "an equal wisdom infrastructure for all human civilizations", completely end the era of human ideological colonization and civilization imbalance, protect global civilization diversity and the ideological sovereignty of all mankind, and make AI truly a guardian of the symbiosis and common prosperity of human civilization.

---

编制人 / Formulated by：Lonngdong Gu（贾龙栋）/ 贾子（Kucius）

发布机构 / Issued by：GG3M Think Tank（鸽姆智库）

发布日期 / Issuance Date：2026 年 3 月